Aylesbury planning crisis may hit Winslow
A lack of five year land supply has hit many
districts around the country, undermining local planning and leading to many
unplanned speculative developments being approved by the planning inspectorate under
the presumption in favour of sustainable development. Now it is the turn of Aylesbury
Vale to be in the face of a planning storm. After a
planning inspector said the number of homes anticipated by the Vale of
Aylesbury Plan was too low, and the council had failed in its duty to cooperate,
the plan has been withdrawn.
Councillors are
suggesting that the number of homes
planned will have to rise substantially. An Aylesbury Vale council
paper sets out the four year saga. The council will need a revise its plan
at a time when
it is axing 13 posts from its planning department.
A public inquiry into three housing schemes
totalling 3,000 homes at Hampden Fields, Fleet Marston and Weedon Hill on the
outskirts of Aylesbury finished in December. These schemes have been strongly
opposed, but could now be approved under the presumption in favour of
sustainable development, even though they conflict with the draft Vale of
Aylesbury Plan.
Eyes will also turn to the small town of Winslow, on East West
Rail, between Aylesbury and Buckingham. Aylesbury Vale’s planning committee recently
approved 250 homes on
land adjacent to Furze Lane, Winslow. The development is in line with the
emerging Winslow neighbourhood plan. The same committee threw out a bid by
Gladman developments to build 200 houses outside the planned area. Gladman,
which wants to double the size of Winslow, has had a number of applications rejected
and may now be expected to appeal on the basis of five year land supply and the
presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The draft Winslow neighbourhood
plan is
to be examined on 14 February. This examination is set to become an
important test case on whether a neighbourhood plan can proceed in the absence
of a up-to-date local plan and a substantial fall in housing land supply as
demanded by the National Planning Policy Framework.
No comments:
Post a Comment